This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of University of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania articles
I think neutrality is a concern; the only other major contributor to both this page and that of Sharon Exley is Funarchitect (talk·contribs); the name suggests WP:COI, as does the fact that it's a WP:SPA, or single purpose account. Your edit histories also suggest a closely coordinated editing relationship. None of that is a violation of guidelines per se, but the most recent additions of passages on an apparently non notable publication, with an image of the book's cover used in both biographies, heightens concerns. It would be better if you hadn't restored the material in question, or removed the COI tag. I'm loath to edit war, and prefer to take this to an appropriate noticeboard for further review. 99.12.243.171 (talk) 01:11, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I too am loathe to squabble and would just as soon not contribute to Wikipedia. My expertise is in early medical photography and I have made many contributions of benefit to other scholars. I contend that my contribution of the Peter Exley page will also be of service to scholars. Not just architects who respect Exley's work, but anyone who visits the Ronald McDonald House in Oak Lawn and who desires to learn more about the origin, design and execution of the facility, will benefit by this information. Project managers will also benefit by information on Exley's projects including his installations at the Exploration Station, Dupage Children's Museum, Lincoln Park Zoo. There is no question of Exley's Wikipedia relevance. If there is a question of the credentials of the bibliographer presenting this information, that is a tough hurdle for Wikipedia(ns) to manage. These talk pages were put in place to hash out problems of relevance and authenticity. For my part, I enjoy sharing my knowledge with other scholars and have received ten fold for what I have given.Cabinet of Art and Medicine (talk) 04:20, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Which doesn't seem to address the issue at hand. Neither your good intentions nor credentials are being called into question. As noted, I am concerned with several issues, about which I've begun a discussion here [1]. 99.12.243.171 (talk) 04:26, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
