Talk:Peter Edwards (historian)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and infobox;
- Remove the year of the awards, they are just messing up the infobox. The award names are pretty long.
  - I respectfully disagree. While the award names are long, the year of award adds little space-wise and helps track certain periods in Edwards' career. The use here is also consistent with a number of similar articles. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Section 1;
- 1937–49 -> 1937–1949, per MOS:DATERANGE
  - Is this in reference to the book? If so, the shortened year range is the official title. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Section 2; all good
Section 2.1;
- Crises & Commitments received ~~a somewhat~~ contentious reception
  - I think the qualification is warranted here as the book was not completely contentious, but there was objection to it from some. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- H.T. Priestley -> H. T. Priestley, per MOS:INITIALS
  - Done. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Section 2.2;
- 1996–98 -> 1996–1998, per MOS:DATERANGE
- 2002–08 -> 2002–2008
  - Done. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
30.6% confidence, but I understand that these are the book titles. Violation unlikely. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the review, Krishna. It is much appreciated. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 06:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]