Talk:Peter Collins (New South Wales politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: New South Wales / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Peter Collins (New South Wales politician) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Infobox

It looks hugely unwieldy to have a massive infobox stretching the entire length of the article and running into the series of footers that give all the relevant information. If we must have the dates, please put them in the footers and leave the infobox as it was. If some sort of justification isn't given for them, I will re-remove. Rebecca (talk) 09:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, the bottom boxes look weird rather than the side ones. The side infobox appears to be the current standard for politicians and maybe you should discuss that at the template. Four days for a discussion. Wow, that's quick. At the end of four days, I will revert back. Assize (talk) 20:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What current standard? The navboxes have pretty much universal usage across the project, both Australian and overseas articles (Canada, UK, US); the stuffing of the same info into epic infoboxes seems to be just scattered across a few NSW articles, evidently done by just a couple of users. Rebecca (talk) 07:47, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]