Talk:Peter Bielkowicz
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I'm working on this page. There's cool stuff coming... Please give me a minute, or two. Please post here, do not simply delete this page.
- Praytell, what does Givhan have to do with this guy? Why the link? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 01:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Brig Gen Givhan was one of his friends. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RedThunderBuster (talk • contribs) 02:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Folks, there's lots of sources to show his notability: [1], [2], and [3]. Bearian (talk) 02:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
This article concernc Peter Bielkowicz the notable physicist. Please take note that there is another Peter Bielkowicz, a computer scientist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RedThunderBuster (talk • contribs) 03:28, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Semi-protection requested
[edit]Because of the disruptive IPs adding unrelated videos and stuff, I have asked for this article to be semi-protected. De728631 (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Editors and administrators are being disruptive vandals to this page
[edit]Editors and administrators are being disruptive vandals to this page by removing bib refs, i.e. vandal by De728631 GraYoshi2x shifted to Grayshi Jarkeld reverted; please use discussion page before vandalizing, i.e. deleting work! And check the references, please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.17.25.219 (talk) 16:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- The images are not augmenting the article. No direct link to the subject.
- There is no need for all his work to be used as references.
- Several other references do not have anything to do with the subject of the article. References should be relevant to the subject of the article.
- The main text is clearer now than the version you keep putting back.
- Please stop vandalizing this article. Jarkeld (talk) 18:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, this one reference doesn't look bad [4]. It's published by Air University Press (although I haven't looked at the credentials of this publisher), and pages 59-60 are on topic and they cover well the second paragraph. Anyone has a problem with me re-adding this source to the article? --Enric Naval (talk) 09:43, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
citations for verification.
[edit]Please check revision 19:12, 7 March 2010 Jarkeld (talk | contribs) (2,692 bytes) (Undid revision 348374049 by 83.9.216.23 (talk)) for citations for verification deleted by Jarkeld . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.183.42.9 (talk)
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Automatically assessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Poland articles
- Low-importance Poland articles
- WikiProject Poland articles