Talk:Pete Bevacqua

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 September 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

AfC?

Is this supposed to be an AfC submission? Adam9007 (talk) 01:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what AfC is

BdgroverBdgrover (talk) 17:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should lede include "29,000"??

I'm not going to get into an edit war with an IP over this. The IP has inserted the 29000 into this phrase in the lede "serving the association's 29,000 PGA Professionals." numerous times over the past couple times. I don not believe the number is of any use nor does it belong in Pete's article. The PGA will grow or shrink, the current large number to me seems promotional. It does not add in any way shape or form except to make Pete look powerful and successful. Communicate, IP, or I will file a request for consensus and or seek action against your edit warring. Thanks, L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 15:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]