Talk:Perth-class destroyer
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Perth-class destroyer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article
[edit]Strong start class - military ship infobox is needed.--Oldwildbill 08:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Perth sydbridge.jpg
[edit]Image:Perth sydbridge.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Pennant numbers
[edit]I was on the HMAS Brisbane (1991-1993) and I suspect calling it D41 (and the other destroyers Dxx) is not correct, as we always called it DDG41. Is there anything to verify this naming convention? Lmb71 (talk) 08:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ross Gillet's Australian and New Zealand Warships since 1946 gives "D" as the pennant identifier for all three ships. While Brisbane's history does not appear on the Navy website, the page for sister ship Hobart gives "D39" (see the infobox and the placard in the photo of the launching ceremony). Although DDG was both the US Navy hull code for ships of this type and the shorthand for the particular class (DDG is a lot easier on the tongue than "Charles F. Adams class guided missile destroyer"), at the time the Perths entered Australian service, the RAN was still fairly wed to the British pennant system. Things may have changed by the time you served on Brisbane (by which point the RAN had migrated to a identification system based on the US hull number system and we were operating the definitely-FFG Adelaides) but the ships spent at least the early part of their careers without the extra "DG". -- saberwyn 09:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- C-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- C-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
- C-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Low-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Start-Class Australian maritime history articles
- Low-importance Australian maritime history articles
- WikiProject Australian maritime history articles
- WikiProject Australia articles