Talk:Personal life of Lindsay Lohan

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Presidential Campaign

I added a presidential campaign section, why was it removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historybufffanatic2005 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Personal life of Lindsay Lohan

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Personal life of Lindsay Lohan's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "observer":

From Michael Lohan: Morgan, Spencer (August 14, 2007). "The Parent Trap". The New York Observer. Archived from the original on August 25, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)Pages 2, 3, and archived, by necessity, separately. Marriage date on p.2
From Saturday Night Live: Gay, Jason (March 4, 2001). "Meet Four-Eyed New Sex Symbol, 'Weekend Update' Anchor Tina Fey". New York Observer. Retrieved July 1, 2009.

Reference named "MSNBC":

From Miami Beach, Florida: "South Beach: Life imitates art, quite vicely". NBC News. July 25, 2006. Retrieved June 30, 2013.
From Michael Lohan: "Lohan parents' divorce heats up on Long Island". Associated Press. August 6, 2007. Archived from the original on February 12, 2015. Retrieved June 6, 2020 – via Today / MSNBC.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate

It just somehow seems morally wrong to have an entire separate Wikipedia article on someone's personals life. Do celebrities not deserve a little privacy too? Shouldn't this at least be incorporated into her existing Wikipedia page? Does every public figure have / need a "Personal life of..." article? CarlSerafino (talk) 04:45, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would tend to agree. 98.15.180.192 (talk) 07:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The duo dissed one another in the media"

Wat 2600:1700:19E0:96A0:9D29:FD2:F0FE:3A89 (talk) 05:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for Deletion/Merge

I propose deleting the "Personal Life of Lindsay Lohan" page and merging its content into her main article. While the page was likely created to separate her work from her personal life, much of the content is trivial and can be better explained within the context of her main biography. This would prevent redundancy and avoid undue focus on her personal life, ensuring the article remains balanced. The information fits naturally into the main article without causing any size or weighting issues. Merging would also respect her privacy by not sensationalizing details of her personal life. This approach would maintain Wikipedia’s focus on notable information while keeping the article concise and neutral. Brkstn (talk) 02:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. I will support such a merge for the reasons given. Binksternet (talk) 04:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If content from this article is merged into her main article this would need to redirect there to maintain attribution rather than deletion. ~ GB fan 11:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

I would second the proposed deletion, but we are (very) distantly related, so I want to avoid a Conflict of interest. Bearian (talk) 04:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]