Talk:Personal Best (album)

Albums C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Personal Best (album) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 23, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Personal Best (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I will be reviews this article for GA. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the article is unsourced and fails Wikipedia:Verifiability. You have only one good source, the Washington Post article.
All quotations need to have a reliable source.
The lead is too short and is not a summary of the article per WP:LEAD.
There are too many quotations from the songs and reviews and not enough analysis of the topic in the article's own words. The quotes seem to make up most of the article.
The writing is choppy and does not flow. The article is not well written.
The article does not appear to be written from a NPOV.

These problems need to be fixed before the article can be considered for GA. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]