Talk:Persona 2: Innocent Sin/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
"The original version was not localized for western territories, but the PSP version was released" - however

"Persona 2: Innocent Sin is a role-playing game where the player takes control of a group of High School students" - should high school be capitalised here?

Personally I would rephrase "Innocent Sin began development after the release and success of Persona" to Development of Innocent Sin began after the release and success of Persona

"The original audio was lauded by Bartholow, saying the voice acting" - stating
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References check out OK, reliable sources, no evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Neutral
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Stable, no edit warring
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
No images used
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

This article meets the GA criteria and I couldn't find anything worthy of putting this on hold, so I'll pass it now. Well done! JAGUAR 11:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, that was fast! Thank you for the review! (although I was not the one who wrote the article - that honor goes to ProtoDrake).--IDV^talk 11:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]