This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
How can you have a hybrid of 3 unrelated language? persian Arabic and Turkish? it's impossible. Urdu is Indo-Aryan derived from Sanskrit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.68.85 (talk) 02:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
First, mixed languages do exist, even if clear examples are rare. Second, this article does not claim that Urdu descends from Persian, Arabic or Turkish, merely that there are many borrowings from these languages in Urdu. Of course, Urdu is Indo-Aryan; the influence from Persian (etc.) is merely lexical. That said, there are highly Persianate registers of Urdu, taken to extremes in Qaumi Tarana, which can be described with some justification as factually "hybrid" in some sense, even if Urdu is not recognised as a genuine mixed language, pidgin or creole. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 18:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't this article be merged into the Urdu article, or perhaps the Hindi-Urdu page (as it could help differentiate the Hindi and Urdu registers)? It is a very short article and not easy to find; most people interested in the influence of Persian on Urdu (which is what this article is about) would naturally go to the Urdu page. I am not trying to start a flame war and apologize if this has been discussed before (but if so I do not see it in the talk page). Cheers, Dave (djkernen)|Talk to me|Please help!14:07, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this article's content should be merged into the Urdu article. It could be a good article on its own if it was more fleshed out, but since that hasn't been done in 10+ years, it would be more useful for this to be a section in the Urdu article Havoc219 (talk) 03:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]