Talk:Perfect Symmetry (Keane album)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not vandalism
[edit]There is no accordance in which song information about songs shall not be posted on Wikipedia. If you continue to revert this, I'll simply get the information into separate articles.--Fluence (talk) 18:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's only vandalism because you kept re-adding it. As it was, it was effectively a list (discouraged), and almost entirely trivia (discouraged). Now, under the title "themes", it is good. Expanding this section this section to show the themes of the album and how it differs from Keane's earlier work, without splitting it into sections on each song, is the way forward. U-Mos (talk) 12:00, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
New single
[edit]Keane have said in Keane Weekly News (which is a fancy way of saying fanmail) sent yesterday that Perfect Symmetry will be their next single, released Dec 29th:
NEXT SINGLE REVEALED
We're very pleased to reveal that the next single from the new album will be its rousing title track. Perfect Symmetry will be released on December 29th and should start popping up on the radio soon. The B-sides, video and artwork are currently being finalised and we'll get those to you as soon as we have them.
If someone wants to make a new page, I noticed the song doesn't have its own. Ginger Warrior (talk) 12:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Ginger Warrior
Is not only a single but a music video was released. Someone should create that page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.13.43.182 (talk) 22:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
#2 Argentina?
[edit]I'm from Argentina, and the album was not very known. I didn't heard it in the radios (that point is invalid anyway cause I don't hear a lot radios lol!). But it sounds strange to me that it reached the position #2
Reception section?
[edit]For a recent release by a pop band, I've noticed that this, as well as the bands other two albums, have no reception section unlike pretty much every other CD on wikipedia...
What is going on? Whoever wrote the article has missed alot of key information, and added alot of nonsense. --A Chain Of Flowers (talk) 21:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- In case you haven't noticed, most reception sections include more non-sense than whatever the rest of the article is. These sections are nothing but a paragraph quoting so-called critics on whether they liked the album or not. All critics should be assassinated.--Fluence (talk) 03:16, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Better Than This
[edit]will someone make a single page for "Better Than This" please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.88.5 (talk) 00:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles
- Start-Class Alternative music articles
- Low-importance Alternative music articles
- WikiProject Alternative music articles
- Start-Class electronic music articles
- Low-importance electronic music articles
- WikiProject Electronic music articles