Talk:Perdido Sin Ti

Perdido Sin Ti has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 16, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Latin music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ricky Martin Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ricky Martin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ricky Martin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ricky MartinWikipedia:WikiProject Ricky MartinTemplate:WikiProject Ricky MartinRicky Martin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Moving this page

This page must move to "Perdido sin ti" without stress; that's the correct spelling in Spanish. Gonzaka (talk) 21:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, per WP:Naming conventions (capitalization), we are to use the capitalization of foreign-language found in English-language sources. Erick (talk) 17:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Perdido Sin Ti/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 22:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Non-free use rationale for the infobox image looks good.
Add a MOS:DATECOMMA after "August 18, 1998".
Add a hyphen between "seventh best".
At Talk:Vuelve (Ricky Martin song)/GA1, I left a comment about citing sources from Newspapers.com.
That's about it. Images are tagged properly and sources are reliable.

@Some Dude From North Carolina:

Done, thank you so much. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 23:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed