This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
...deals with ONE issue, Per-Åke Theander as footballer. Multiple issues ??? Some of his team mates called him "the Basil Fawlty of his club". This is not a second subject. John Cleese and Fawlty Towers was enormously popular during his time as player. Nothing ackward with that. Boeing720 (talk) 03:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Boeing720: First of all, both tags are placed to improve article. By no means, they are put to undermine your and others effort to write and improve this article. You can review copy editing and sections, and try to write according to guidelines. Once issues are fixed, you can remove both tags. Putting tags draw attention of users who like to improve articles. So, putting tags will help improve this article not the other way around. Having tags are not bad thing. I would suggest you to put tags back.
One example where improvement is required is first paragraph, which says " ... He was an own product of Landskrona BoIS, a club he became faithful to throughout his entire career". In my opinion we can re-write and make it more clear. Also, having sections improve reading of an article. I hope, I have clarified reason for putting tags.--Spasage (talk) 14:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"own product" - he began as a kid in the club, "edjucated in the club". He never represented any other club either. (both with sources) The tag was about "multiple issues". That can I not really see. Thanks. Boeing720 (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]