Talk:People's Party (Serbia, 2017)/Archive 1

Archive 1

People's party MPs

Doesn't it have 3 MPs, and not 2? Sanda Rašković-Ivić, Dijana Vukomanović and Miroslav Aleksić. All three of them are members of the People's Party Presidency. --WikiNameBaks (talk) 17:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 13 January 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved, moved. No consensus to move the first, but yes to the second, per PDAB. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 15:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

---

• People's Party (Serbia, 2017) → People's Party (Serbia)
• People's Party (Serbia) → People's Party (Serbia, 1990)

– I'm proposing this move considering that I believe that the People's Party that was formed in 2017 is much more notable than the ones that were formed in 1990 and 2008. The People's Party (1990) only held one seat in the National Assembly of Serbia for two years (1990–1992) during its whole existence and it seems like it shortly began to fade into irrelevance after it lost that seat. The People's Party from 2008 only held two seats in the National Assembly for a few months before its MPs joined the Serbian Progressive Party in 2012. Regarding online sources (news and books) for the 1990 and 2008 People's Party, they exist although in a much smaller amount in comparison to the current People's Party, which has 12 representatives in the National Assembly, 6 in the City Assembly of Belgrade, and is composed of members who previously served in the government or held other high ranking public offices. If this move succeeds, the People's Party from 2008 would not be affected. Vacant0 (talk) 21:14, 13 January 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

• Pinging @CJCurrie and Elserbio00: to hear their opinions considering that they are active editors in this topic and previously took part in similar request moves. --Vacant0 (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Support - Per above. Jeremić's People's Party is much more notable and relevant, hence the page should be moved to People's Party (Serbia). Elserbio00 (talk) 21:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose 1, support 2 per WP:PDAB. 162 etc. (talk) 21:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

  Well, in this case this article is the primary topic. See People's Party (Spain) for example, it is not named People's Party (Spain, 1989) but just People's Party (Spain), even though the People's Party (Spain, 1976) once existed. There are more examples such as the New Zealand Liberal Party, New Zealand Liberal Party (1962), New Zealand Liberal Party (1991). If you think that WP:PDAB should apply to this page, then it should be applied to People's Party (Spain) and New Zealand Liberal Party too. Vacant0 (talk) 23:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

  Indeed,I would also be in favour of moving the articles you named above, for the same reason. 162 etc. (talk) 17:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

  Well I strongly disagree with this though feel free to start discussions on their talk pages if you think that WP:PDAB should be applied there too. Vacant0 (talk) 10:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Against 1, Support 2 Both parties are minor in general, so there is no "true" peoples party Braganza (talk) 09:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Somebody challenged the primary topic assertion. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.