Talk:People's Monarchist Party (Portugal)

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Are they in the Assembly or not? -Mikedelsol 08:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are, but only because of what looks to me like electoral fusion. Anyway, if you want to tag articels as contradictory, use {{contradict}}, not just the template. Also thanx for explaining on the talk page. 68.39.174.238 22:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link

The external link to the party's website appears to be broken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.32.10 (talk) 23:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do they support a claimant?

If Dom Duarte Pio is not a supporter of the PPM, do they advocate someone else should sit on the throne of a restored Portuguese monarchy? The heir of the Viseu line, perhaps ... or even Signor Poidimani? Jess Cully 11:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right wing?

Apart from supporting monarchy, the party is a green party. I doubt that it is correct to call it a right wing party. More likely centre left.122.59.167.152 (talk) 00:46, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on People's Monarchist Party (Portugal). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002035216/http://www.ppm.com.pt/ to http://www.ppm.com.pt/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002035216/http://www.ppm.com.pt/ to http://www.ppm.com.pt/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002035216/http://www.ppm.com.pt/ to http://www.ppm.com.pt/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]