This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
I know it can seem contradictory, but we need to bear in mind that Wikipedia's an encylopedia, not a tourist information site. The addition of the visitors' information section is taking it close to the latter. The British Museum, as just one example, doesn't have such a section. KJP1 (talk) 17:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. While (at the time) I hadn't noted this Talk Page thread, I had the same concerns on that content. And removed it some time ago. However, since then, I have noted that some of the COI/PROMO/NOTWEBHOST/NOTGUIDE overtones (if perhaps not quite as overt as before) are starting to creep again. Editors, in particular those with a potential conflict of interest, are reminded to consider the relevant policies before deciding whether and what to add to this article. Guliolopez (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
