Talk:Pennsylvania Route 666/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, but I've got class in 15 minutes and I have to leave. Give me 2-3 hours and I should have the reviews up...at the MOST I'll have it up by tonight. Cheers, —the_ed17— 17:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- What the heck is a "hamlet"? (this isn't Shakespeare, so... :D)
In some of the section titles, you have "Old PA 666". What is this?Never mind, I skipped over it in my reading.
- What the heck is a "hamlet"? (this isn't Shakespeare, so... :D)
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Two very minor issues. Fix those and the article passes. Cheers! —the_ed17— 21:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done. Don't forget to transclude the page.Mitch32(UP) 21:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC)