Jump to content

Talk:Pennsylvania Route 65

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineePennsylvania Route 65 was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 9, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
March 9, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Ideas

[edit]

If anyone has any ideas to improve this article or would like to add an image please do. Your help is greatly appreciated. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 21:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

US 422 Business concurrency?

[edit]

I'm curious as to where the concurrency with US 422 Business came from, as I cannot find any source indicating a concurrency between PA 65 and US 422 BUS. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 22:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right TMF, i checked mapquest. I better change that. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 18:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking for a bright future for this article but i'll need your help TMF plus other editors from the Pittsburgh area (though you and me aren't from Pittsburgh). I need someone to rewrite the description in a formal way becuase i suck at writing anything. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 18:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More Helpers

[edit]

I'm not from Pittsburgh, but i'll give a helping hand. -- PHI5000 14:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great! we need more helpers though. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 18:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, you're a vandal. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 20:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article

[edit]

I failed this as a Good Article candidate because it lacks information about the early routings, and - more importantly - does not cite reliable sources. --NE2 16:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll renominate this article in a couple of days, but i need to make some minor changes. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 16:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]