Talk:Pennsylvania Route 456/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 19:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this.—– 19:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Overall, not a bad job.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Honestly, I wouldn't type a whole paragraph about two short, insignificant bridges.
- B. Focused:
- I'm very sure a description of a 12 mile road could be (slightly) longer than that, and a Pennsylvania route usually has more history than that.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- No controversial sections.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- No pictures, but it will be okay without one.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Comments
- No designation date in the infobox?
Done but I still can't find the designation date, I just wrote a time period (between 1930-1940) that I know it was created
- Information about the two bridges should belong in the history more than the description. You only need a slight mention in the route description.
- Box Beam → Box beam
Done
- Where on the road was the traffic count measured?
Done
- If you are going to talk about the bridge, maybe talk about when it was built?
Done
- You are missing the cartographer parameters in {{Cite map}}.
- A KML file would be nice.
- I might be wrong, but isn't Pennsylvania State Highway Agency PennDOT?
Done Fixed, I believe you are right.
- The part about the route not in the NHS is kinda unnecessary.
Done
- I recommend that you move the third paragraph of the Route description to history.
I kept most of the material in the 'Route description' section, but I moved some of it (creation dates and reconstruction date) to the 'History' section
- 'All of PA 456 has an annual average daily traffic of about 526 vehicles per day.' "All of" is redundant
discussed this with you on IRC
- Try to organize the route description from south to north, or west to east. The sentence about Little Cove Creek should be before the sentence about Licking Creek, I think.
- There's a typo in the route description's third paragraph.
Done
- Now you've added more information to the description, I suggest merging the first 4 paragraphs together.
- Instead of a separate paragraph on bridges, describe the bridges where the route passes it.
This articles still has many issues with citations and organization, and I think this would take lots of time to work on. I'm afraid that I will have to fail this article for now. You can renominate the article if you want to.—– 22:22, 18 January 2014 (UTC)