Talk:Pennsylvania Route 434/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

• You abbreviate some PA Routes as PA x and spell out others... add (PA x) in the lead, then keep all of the rest as PA x.
• "The highway then gets rural really quickly" not very encyclopedic...
• "A short time later, the highway passes a couple homes and crossing a river." crossing? what about "and crosses a river" - also do we know the name of the river?
• "After the concurrency with US 6" - it was concurrent? Thats not mentioned in the RD.
• "The creek continues to parallel, with the highway turning in several different directions for a distance. " - can you rephrase this?
• Do you have mile posts for the US 6 overlay in the JCT list?

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold --Admrboltz (talk) 23:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

All done. Also for #3, it is mentioned already.Mitch32^(UP) 23:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Passing. --Admrboltz (talk) 23:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)