Talk:Pennsylvania Route 313/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   MoS issues are plenty. The first sentence of the lead needs a metric conversion. "East-west" needs an en dash, and the overall writing is poor, as well. For example, in the RD, avoid using the word "goes", "then", and don't start sentences with number characters. Also, the RD section needs metric conversions throughout. In the history section, stand along years shouldn't be linked.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   For an 18 mile route, the RD should be substantially longer. The history section also needs more information. When the road was assigned in 1928, what was its original route?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   A map would be nice, as would an image, but that's not a big deal.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Sorry, but overall, the article needs significant work in the form of expansion and copyediting. As such, the article fails for now. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 16:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)