Talk:Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the Background section, "From March 1781", it would be best if is a comma placed after "1781".
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- In the Background section, "From March 1781", it would be best if is a comma placed after "1781".
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Dates are to be un-linked, per here.
- Half-check. The date in the infobox needs to be un-linked. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Half-check. The date in the infobox needs to be un-linked. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Dates are to be un-linked, per here.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- It would be best if Image:JohnDickinson.jpg is placed on the left, per here.
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- It would be best if Image:JohnDickinson.jpg is placed on the left, per here.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the following statements can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:22, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- All corrected. Thanks for taking the time to perform the review. Best, epicAdam(talk) 15:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- I knew I'd forget something! Best, epicAdam(talk) 22:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you to epicAdam for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- I knew I'd forget something! Best, epicAdam(talk) 22:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)