[Untitled]

I am not a master of the wiki or this really fits into the article but there was story about the trial on This American Life episode 285 "Know Your Enemy" Act 3, I think this could be linked to, purhaps as a cited source. List of This American Life Episodes

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/pages/descriptions/05/285.html

86.63.178.138 11:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC) AC[reply]

It depicts a number of penises entering women's vaginas.

Women's vaginas? You kid me! --Paraiba 00:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A beautiful work of art!

In terms of great 20th century works, it's right up there with Andy Warhol's urinal.

I think you mean Duchamp. --Walkersam 21:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Penis Landscape was a nickname that was given. Work 219: Landscape XX was the game given by the author if I recall reading. --FlareNUKE 13:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it's best known as penis landscape i think. penis landscape could redirect to "landscape xx" i suppose.

Contradict Tag

Please see WHAT discussion on this talk page? ;^)

I'm going to assume the tag is the result of the 'Painted in '73, no wait '77' bit - I don't have any facts, but I'd be willing to say it was painted in '73, and then exhibited in Paris in '77, thus garnering the attention of Omni (magazine). I don't know where to look that up, but I'll see what I can find...

In any case, if this isn't the focus of the Self-Contradict tag, please clarify what needs to be addressed. Empath 19:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, step one didn't take long - Giger's 'database' at [1] has '# 219 / Landscape XX (Landschaft XX)' done in 1973...now how to find either the Omni article (maybe that was in '77) or the Paris art collection... Empath 20:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Working under the assumption that Empath's observation was correct (supported by the content of the tag), I changed "painted" to "printed" and removed the Contradict tag. If there are any other issues (for example, the article needs at least a dozen {{fact}} tags), please feel free to tag away... Cheers. Haus^Talk 00:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Frankenchrist.jpeg

The image Image:Frankenchrist.jpeg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:37, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image used

Shouldn't the article show the actual painting rather than the Frankenchrist poster? I for one believe it ruins the ac ruins the actual piece of art and should only be used on the articles concerning the album or the obscenity case rather than the article on the painting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.137.143.170 (talk) 14:46, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a link to an article that has an image of the painting. Perhaps someone who has an account would like to upload a low-resolution version. 24.24.214.15 (talk) 00:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penislandscapeonmyfloorl.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Penislandscapeonmyfloorl.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:46, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Condom--Removed/something to watch out for

Removing the part after condom. This looks like vandalism frankly. Not sure why the citation is there.

"It depicts a number of penises entering vaginas, arranged in an alternating pattern. One is wearing a condom, evoking a sense of the futility and diminished sensuality of "protected" sex^{[citation needed]}."[2]

--184.63.132.236 (talk) 09:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Penis Landscape. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130218013842/http://www.wired.com:80/underwire/2010/02/hr-gigers-cyborg-horror-merges-sex-tech-legend/7 to http://www.wired.com/underwire/2010/02/hr-gigers-cyborg-horror-merges-sex-tech-legend/7/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]