Talk:Penicillium turcosoconidiatum
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Penicillium turcosoconidiatum article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Penicillium turcosoconidiatum be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Refimprove August 2018
[edit]I don't think taxon articles necessarily need a ton of references if they are validly described and accepted by the various relevant database. P. turcosoconidiatum was described in 2014 and is an accepted taxon in Species Fungorum, MycoBank, and NCBI. I'm going to go ahead and remove that refimprove tag because I don't think any of the text of the article at the time of this comment requires additional citations for verification, but please do let me know if there is something I'm missing here. Thanks! –Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 17:44, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Microbiology articles
- Low-importance Microbiology articles
- Microbiology articles needing images
- WikiProject Microbiology articles
- Stub-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class Fungi articles
- Low-importance Fungi articles
- Wikipedia requested images of fungi
- WikiProject Fungi articles
- Start-Class Soil articles
- Low-importance Soil articles
- WikiProject Soil articles
- Start-Class South Africa articles
- Low-importance South Africa articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in South Africa
- WikiProject South Africa articles