Talk:Pendragon (band)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pendragon (band) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability???
[edit]Here we go again. 32 years, 20 albums 4 DVDs, and yet they still may not be notable? That only suggests to me that current notability guidelines are excessively exclusive. Lee M (talk) 14:38, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Notable
[edit]the band is obviously notable just needs more reliable sources. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 12:35, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Questions
[edit]Is it appropriate for the link for Scott Higham to direct to a different band, rather than a page for Mr. Higham? I don't believe I've ever seen that on another page. --Unseelie23 (talk) 00:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Pendragon discography
[edit]Support split - Discography section takes up more than one third of the page, and should be split to a new article entitled Pendragon discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:39, 28 November 2015 (UTC)