Talk:Pendragon: Before the War

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Begin

I have added infomation about the books here so there is now no realy need to delete it, so shouldn't the notification be taken down? Posted by Me.

Well? Posted my the same Me as before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.220.214 (talk) 22:27, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was me! XD Stupid old ME! And look! I can sign it now! 90.192.86.97 (talk) 13:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I have merged the one existent page with the two non-existent pages. That way, until they are all out, we can have a suitable article. Once they are out, we can discuss spliting them. *SIGN* 20:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Sorrells

I have added him to the contibuting authors twice. I would like to know why you deleted him from the page, please. 90.198.220.219 (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because you didn't give a source. Which is what I said in my edit summary. Please provide a source, either on the article or here, or I will remove it again. *SIGN* 14:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon.com explains that the author is Walter Sorrolls. Is this not enough? 90.198.220.219 (talk) 14:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add a cite but I didn't do it correctly. Please help and by the way, why did you delete Walter Sorrells again? I added a cite and told you here about it, so why did you delete it? I am confused.... 90.198.220.219 (talk) 14:25, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll format it. And I didn't delete it again, check the article history to see who did. *SIGN* 14:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see now. It was someone else. Okay. Ooops. Nearly forgot to sign it... 90.198.220.219 (talk) 14:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Amazon isn't exactly reliable, I trust it, but others might not. If an established editor objects, the ref is gone and so is the information it cites. Unless of course, you can provide a sound reason for Amazons reliability or a new source for the information. *SIGN* 14:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know anymore about it. Hmmm. What would happen if I asked D.J.MacHale? 90.198.220.219 (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I GOT IT!!! On Walter's Official Site, it explains that he is writting two books for DJ!!! I found it. Yay. Should I add it to the main page? 90.198.220.219 (talk) 14:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added it. You may need to edit my sloppy work, though. Sorry. 90.198.220.219 (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't say which two. He could be collaborating on the first. I have also removed the "Questions" section because its OR(Original Research) and NN(non-notable). *SIGN* 18:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the official site, the name "Carla Jablonski" (or however you spell it) it written as creator of the first one, and the others are written by him, since he says it is two Prequels he is writing. Is this clarifacation? 90.198.220.118 (talk) 12:33, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That just further affirms my point. She wrote two and he wrote two, but there are only three. Let me see a link. *SIGN* 09:57, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant one. 90.198.220.40 (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Provide a link that states that... Actually. Nevermind. I'll fix it. If someone complains, tough. This kind of OR is okay. *SIGN* 21:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aww...

It took me AGES to do that! Oh, well... Why wasn't it worth it, RauJ? (is that how you spell you name? Sorry)) 90.198.220.125 (talk) 21:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

at least I catagorized it! lol. 90.198.220.125 (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not needed because it's trivial. Information on the covers, unless exceptionally notable, isn't needed in the article. The only information on that will be added when images are added. Exceptionally notable information would be if the covers get media attention, like a book is banned because of a controversial cover. *SIGN* 21:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! I understand. Okay, thanks for telling me. Uh, totally of subject, but have you ever heard of Necropolis: Ctiy of the Dead? It is by Anthony Horowitz and the article it named wrong. I have asked, but no-one listens. It is now only called Necropolis, proof on Anthony's official website, www.anthonyhorowitz.com/ . Thanks for reading, anyway. 90.198.220.125 (talk) 22:12, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken care of it, but from now on, whenever you need help with something, ask a person directly on their talk page. For this, you should have contacted me on my own. I'm always willing to help, if I can. *SIGN* 22:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorry about that, though. Um, should we put links to both covers on the here or not bother? Becuase the first two covers have now been revealed... (I love the second one!!) 90.192.86.23 (talk) 14:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not links, but actual images. Hows the one thats there? It makes it a bit long in my opinion... Perhaps we should only use one of them. *SIGN* 21:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... It does look long. Could you get smaller images that would fit beside one another or would it be illeagal or too small? Hmm. I would use one. Two makes it too long. I would say book two, but if it is for a begginer, they are going to go looking for the the first one, so... I wonder... 90.192.86.23 (talk) 21:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not illegal, actually, using two might cause problems. Side by side would make the table fat. I'll change the image to the first one(pretty much for the reason you listed). *SIGN* 22:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is better. Not what I prefer, but definitely better than doubling the length of the page. *SIGN* 22:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, definarely better! Hey, um, you forgot to edit out "book one and two covers." I'll do that now. Do you read the books, then? Sorry, just curious. I assume you do, but have no idea lol. 90.192.86.97 (talk) 12:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I read and own all of the books. I will probably order the first spin-off(book one for this article) this month. Also, this kind of thing goes on editors talk pages as well. The only thing this page is really used for is to discuss improvements on the article itself. But most editors forget that and chat away anyway... ;] *SIGN* 18:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Sorry about that. Shouldn't there be a page for the Pendragon Wedsite, as it had a forum and the lastest news updates and so on and so forth? Am I just thinking about to much now? XD M.J.Sams-Barnes (talk) 12:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I finally got an acount! Lol. I just don't know what to put on my page... M.J.Sams-Barnes (talk) 12:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]