Talk:Pelican Pete
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pelican Pete redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Pelican Pete appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 April 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Badly written sentence
[edit]"The backdrop is a water falls upon which Pelican Rapids receives its name" reads very poorly. Is it trying to say "The backdrop is a waterfall from which Pelican Rapids receives its name"? Or is it trying to say "The backdrop is water falling from the dam where the rapids after which Pelican Rapids is named used to be". Or what??? -- SGBailey (talk) 10:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Changed the sentence to: The backdrop is a waterfalls upon which Pelican Rapids receives its name from the rapids the dam makes. From there you know of course you can edit the article.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- I can chnage the grammar, but one has to be careful making it read well that the meaning does not change at the same time. -- SGBailey (talk) 15:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Revision of April 5th 2011 - photograph
[edit]I've just revised this article in several ways and hope it's an improvement. The changes include some rearranging and adjustments to style, but most importantly I made corrections to the details about Pelican Pete's location, the city, river and rapids, and so on.
Of course, the job isn't finished. But I'll leave it mostly to others.
The main niggle I have at present is the photograph. Apparently somebody intended to remove the distorted building on the right side of the image, but didn't do so. I wonder if there is a better photograph that shows the entire sculpture with some good background?Twistlethrop (talk) 14:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/2134. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:15, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- See also WP:DCGAR. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:15, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- NA-Class Minnesota articles
- Low-importance Minnesota articles
- NA-Class sculpture articles
- WikiProject Sculpture articles
- NA-Class Tourism articles
- Low-importance Tourism articles
- WikiProject Travel and Tourism articles
- NA-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles