Talk:Pehr Henrik Nordgren

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Finland

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

i know this is flawed, but at least it's up there. this was edited from a computer translation of the german wikipedia entry for him. Don't complain, fix!! It's better than creating a stub!--MM 20:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

an incomprehensible sentence in the article about Pehr Henrik Nordgren

In the last paragraph of the article about Pehr Henrik Nordgren, there is a sentence that is evidently an inaccurate translation from German: "Nordgren's style proceeds from the ... cluster technology Ligetis, refers however many further elements and can altogether than pluralistisch being designated." Clearly "Ligetis" is the possessive form of the surname of the composer Ligeti, and "pluralistisch" could be translated as "pluralistic" in English, depending on context. My German is fluent, but I have no idea what "can altogether than pluralistisch being designated" is intended to mean, hence it's impossible--at least for me--to attempt to correct it. If I could see the original German sentence, I could probably render it into understandable English, but as it is, this sentence is incomprehensible.

DonaldMWright (talk) 06:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]