Talk:Pederpes

Animals Low‑importance

Pederpes is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reproductive mode

"While undoubtedly amphibian in life and reproductive mode" is unreferenced, and seems to go too far. As far as I'm aware, nothing is known of its reproductive mode, and the animal could be amphibian or amniote in its reproduction. If there is evidence on this point, we would like to hear about it. Macdonald-ross (talk) 04:48, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The quoted passage might make sense if there were only two possibilities: laying eggs in the water and laying them on dry land. If the latter, they would have had to be amniotic. However, there is at least one other possibility: that early tetrapods were ovoviviparous (giving birth to live young), like Coelacanths (see Coelacanth#Life history). At this point there is no hard evidence for any of these possibilities, but the ovoviviparous option is taken very seriously. (Clack, Gaining Ground 2012) For this reason, I am going to remove the offending passage. Zyxwv99 (talk) 21:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]