Talk:Peckham Rye railway station

Trains: Stations / in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What lines?

Article says "It is on both the South London Line and the Catford Loop" but has no link to or explanation of the Catford Loop (just to Catford!) and the service table gives three ways. By Sutton & Mole Valley Lines Peckham Rye to Sutton is a Sutton & Mole Valley Line. Any Help, Truth or Opinions?--SilasW (talk) 20:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Title of picture

As a thumbnail it looked like a floodlit carpark not a gloriously lit up station.--SilasW (talk) 19:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peckham Coal Line

There was reference to it in the Evening Standard of 5 January 2015, and eg here [1] (mentioning PR Station) and here [2]. Will someone more knowledgeable on this topic take it on? A mention here at least. Jackiespeel (talk) 22:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]