Talk:Peckforton Castle/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 12:45, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]After an initial read through, this article appears to be at or about GA-level; I'll therefore carry out a more detailed review, section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Pyrotec (talk) 12:55, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Early history -
- A point point: In the first paragraph the first "he" is, clearly, George Latham; the second "he" is presummably John Tollemache?
- Clarified. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:59, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A short, well-referenced, article on a Cheshire building.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 13:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)