This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Pechory is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles
Russia pulled out of border treaty with Estonia only because Estonia included more points in that treaty already after the treaty had been signed.The estonian acion is considered illegal because additions can only be made upon the agreement of both parties but Russia didn't give its agreement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.148.18.129 (talk) 10:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, this explanation is totally wrong. Estonia did not add any additional points to the treaty. Russia pulled out of the treaty because it did not like the wording of the preamble to the Estonian ratification law. The ratification law makes no changes to the treaty, it merely formalises the treaty into the correct legal context within Estonian law. Martintg (talk) 11:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are wrong.This had nothing to do with estonian ratification law but with the declaration that estonian government attached TO the Treaty during the process of its ratification in estonian parliament.This declaration changes the meaning of the entire Treaty and makes possible legal claims of part of the territory of RF in the future.This declaration would become an undetachable part of the Treaty therefore Russians would have to consider it.In fact,they didn't like the new addition that was made antedate that was why they didn't ratify it. Frank Russian (talk) 11:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, it was the pre-ample contained in the ratification law, which places the treaty into internal context of Estonian law. Nothing was attached to the treaty. This are the facts of the matter. Martintg (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
