Talk:Peanut, California

A fact from Peanut, California appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Peanut is inhospitable to peanuts?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peanut, California.

Wikipedia

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A good reference, for anyone looking to expand this article: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-09-10/usps-shape-california-town-peanut-column-one

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 19:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Peanut is inhospitable to peanuts? Source: Sacramento Bee
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Tjarda Struik

5x expanded by Cielquiparle (talk). Self-nominated at 06:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Peanut, California; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Reviewing... 5x expanded within last 7 days, reads well, QPQ provided. Hook is good, in the article... will complete soon. Whispyhistory (talk) 06:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

.. Hook is in article and in the references following hook fact. No copyvio issues. Can tick it once the citation needed tag comes off. Thank you Cielquiparle... Whispyhistory (talk) 05:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya @Cielquiparle: - this has been here for a month now, and since we've got a backlog, I've fixed the issue. If you have any other issues in reviewing, feel free to ping me and I'll sort them out. Frzzl talk; contribs 17:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Whispyhistory, the reviewer, to see if things are ready; the "citation needed" tag seems to have been replaced by a citation. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

... issue resolved. Whispyhistory (talk) 05:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]