Talk:Peal

Peals -> Peal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Moved. Peal (to be deleted) deleted also. (Sorry it took so long to close, but it does seem obvious to me, also.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 18:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

This article should be named Peal as stated in Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Prefer singular nouns.

The existing redirect page Peal needs to be deleted, as does my unsuccessful attempt Peal (to be deleted), so that Peals can be renamed to Peal. Sorry to have started this the wrong way. Oosoom ^{Talk to me} 13:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

• Support. This seems pretty noncontroversial to me. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 14:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Support. Don't worry, Oosoom, you're fixing it the right way, and that's good. --Dhartung | Talk 07:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

• I know where you're coming from, too -- my first real article was sweepstakes and we got involved in the "s" question there. --Dhartung | Talk 07:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Jargon

This article is somewhat self-referential in that it explains a bit of bellringing jargon (peal) with further bits of bellringing jargon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.199.62.125 (talk) 16:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Framework for Method Ringing

In 2019 the Central Council for Church Bell Ringers withdrew its Decisions on methods and peal ringing and replaced it with the Framework for Method Ringing . This page refers extensively to the old Decisions and needs rewriting to reflect the current guidance given by the Framework for Method Ringing. GACJ (talk) 12:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

References