Talk:Peak wheat

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Globalization Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Hangon

Hey... slow down on the CSD trigger there. Peak Oil has been a huge story. There is no reason to think that Peak Wheat is not one either. Also, this is should be marked as a stub, not "no content." —Noah 04:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, the existing reference will have to be removed since it is merely a one line entry in a web forum. —Noah 04:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another equation

this youtube video by Albert A. Bartlett has an equation at 4:36 which differs from others here. its called the "Expiration Time or "T sub E", of a non-renewable resource whose rate of consumption is growing steadily". I think its highly relevant to all of the articles on peak resource use and limits to growth. If anyone else thinks his equation is relevant, can they transcribe it? the math is beyond me, and i cant reconstruct it from the image on screen.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peak wheat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070704120613/http://www.greatlakesdirectory.org/zarticles/080902_water_shortages.htm to http://www.greatlakesdirectory.org/zarticles/080902_water_shortages.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

wrong source

"In 2022 Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan have restricted exports and levied tariffs on wheat. Higher prices are not meeting any opposition from desperate buyers[18]"

Source [18] is a 2008 article that cannot possibly be discussing 2022 events.

Also, limited exports due to a war have nothing to do with the kind of hypothetical, more fundamental limits to production that "peak X" is supposed to be about. So this probably should not be in this article at all - even if a correct source is found, it likely should be in 2022-2023 food crises instead, which discusses current issues with these kinds of more immediate causes. Vultur~enwiki (talk) 23:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As no one has defended this incorrectly sourced statement in 7 months, I have removed it from the article. Vultur~enwiki (talk) 03:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this article should probably be completely revised

The article is mostly citing late 90s/early 2000s sources, and the more recent updates on things like Chinese grain production is awkwardly integrated into the older material. The article should be clearer on which predictions were accurate, inaccurate, or too long-term to know yet. The article as it is now gives a mixed impression (the lead implies that "peak wheat" is a plausible thing, but all the more recent updates are presented in a way that suggests in fact the predictions were consistently wrong).

There should either be newer sources, or if in fact no newer sources exist (because the idea has kind of been dropped) that should be clear. Vultur~enwiki (talk) 22:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]