Talk:Peak uranium/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am going to pass this article after:

the introduction will be greatly expanded
the external links sectio will be trimmed
please remove language=English parameter from the {{citeweb}} templates

Nergaal (talk) 22:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links

--Stone (talk) 08:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will take some time this weekend to fix these issues. Thanks for the review. Kgrr (talk) 12:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I implemented both Nergaal and Stone's suggestions. Kgrr (talk) 17:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

more

This article is seriously underreferenced. I have added multiple ^{[citation needed]} tags, but they are only at a quick view. Consider adding more than that. Also, I have some problems with how this article is presented: for example the part with peak urianium worlwide and for each country is very messy written (try using the format I used); also, a lot of the text reads like borderline wp:OR. Please consider rewriting the sentences/paragraphs that are presented as an essay. Nergaal (talk) 19:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have worked on the article since you left the endless {{fact}} tags. Everything in the whole article was sourced when it was written. Some statements are introductory paragraphs that are explained in detail in the body of the article. It's gone through several cycles of more intro, less intro, more intro ... and battles by people wanting to insert pro-nuclear POV that don't understand peak uranium.Kgrr (talk) 21:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is anybody still working on the article? Nergaal (talk) 22:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now that the election is over, I will have some more time to volunteer towards the project.Kgrr (talk) 21:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been told that on hold GANs may be left only for 7 days, and in much more than that very little of the issues raised here have been covered. Therefore, for now, this article does not comply with GA criteria. Nergaal (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]