Talk:Peahi, Hawaii

Proposed merge

Pe'ahi (Hawaiian for "wave"), aka Jaws (formerly known as "Domes") is not a beach; it's a wave break. Hawaiians refer to it as "Pe'ahi". Jaws (beach) should be merged into Peahi, Hawaii as the former is a duplicate of the latter, as well as a double misnomer. It may be acceptable to use the article name Peahi (Jaws), although some may disagree. Peahi, Hawaii appears to be part of Haiku-Pauwela, Hawaii. —Viriditas | Talk 12:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I support the merge into this article... --Travis Thurston+ 21:11, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
definitely —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.57.103.19 (talk) 16:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, This article isn't sourced and is written like an advertisement. It should be merged, if not deleted. Mikist4 (talk) 22:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jaws location

From what I'm finding, it seems that the location of Jaws is actually closer to Pauwela than is is to Peahi. Seems one photographer uses "Peahi Point" as the location... [1], [2] More research needed. --Travis Thurston+ 21:20, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To add another twist, it seems that Peahi is within the Haiku-Pauwela CDP in this image. Perhaps a multiple merge is in order?--Travis Thurston+ 21:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would resist merging into the CDP article, since there is a good chance the CDP boundaries will change with the 2010 census. It certainly would make sense mentioning Jaws in the CDP article with a link. There are many precedents of articles about things inside of CDPS that have their own article (e.g. all the Honolulu neighborhood articles) if they are independently notable. The CDP from my experience is more known for its Alexander & Baldwin associations, for example (although I hear that A&B owns the land behind Jaws too!).

I too was confused about actual location. The current Jaws article has it at what GNIS calls Kealii Point, which is even east of the Peahi geographical place, which seems a gultch not a point nor bay I can find. That was probably a guess? I think the trails.com location is too far to the west. I think it is somewhere in between, my guess on the large reef seen in the USGS map, marked as Kapukaulua point. Need to make clear (with sources) the Hawaiian-language pun on the nearby area. W Nowicki (talk) 18:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think a mention of the neighborhood Peahi (part of the Haiku CDP) in the intro is a good idea. Also, I found what could be potentially the "actual" location of Jaws on the Surfline site. [3] --Travis Thurston+ 21:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks that is just a bit farther off shore than I put it, which actually makes sense since the photos from the cliff show the break fairly far out to sea. But I think the coords in the current Jaws beach [sic] article are wrong.

On a related point, are you 100% sure the picture is at Jaws? The bit of foliage in it makes me think it might be Mavericks, and the flickr description does not say, but it is "tagged" with Peahi. W Nowicki (talk) 01:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Peahi, Hawaii/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Jaws (beach) is a candidate to be merged into Peahi, Hawaii. There is no need for two separate articles, both of which pertain to the same topic. —Viriditas | Talk 11:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 11:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 02:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peahi, Hawaii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120118062617/http://www.garrettmcnamara.com:80/blog/?p=381 to http://www.garrettmcnamara.com/blog/?p=381

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]