Jump to content

Talk:Paxton Media Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 5, 2007 Edit

[edit]

I have revised the article, adding an infobox and the 29 daily newspapers owned by Paxton. The weekly newspaper list is incomplete. As Paxton does not appear to have a website, and it is a privately held company, the information appears hard to come by.

I have also added information on criticism of PMG and it's holdings, mainly because I think it is important to hold news and information sources accountable, to insure fair and accurate reporting. I've tried to represent NPOV, but feel free to modify to ensure that it is neutral, if need be.

I also removed the out-of-place information on The Herald-Sun, as it is more appropriate on the newspaper's main article, where that info is already present. The text excised, for posterity, is:

The Herald-Sun in Durham, North Carolina is currently owned by Paxton Media Group. The (Durham) Herald-Sun was formerly The Durham Morning Herald and The Durham Sun merging in the early 1990's. The Durham Sun dates back to 1889.

The Durham Herald Company sold the newspaper and its sister paper The Chapel Hill Herald in January 2005 ending its independent, family-owned status under the Rollins Family.

The Herald-Sun's circulation numbers were 41,000 (Sunday), 39,000 (Monday-Friday) and 34,000 (Saturday) as audited in 2006.

Mustang_DVS (talk|contribs) 21:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paxton Media Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Paxton Media Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]