Talk:Paweł Jasienica/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: One found and tagged.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 00:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- The lead is too short, it should fully summarise the article, see WP:LEAD Not done
His grandfather from the father side, Ludwik Beynar, fought in the January Uprising, and married a Spanish woman, Joanna Adela Feugas "paternal side"?DoneHis granfather from the mother's side, Wiktor Maliszewski, fought in the November Uprising Spelling "grandfather", "maternal side"Done- Beynar's family lived in Russia and Ukraine Use the subject name as in the article name. Or move the article to his real name leaving a redirect. Not done
...he also worked as a speaker in the Polish Radio Wilno "on"DoneHe also begun his career as the writer and essayist ungrammaticalDone- In 1935 he debuted as an amateur historian Clumsy, suggest simpler "IN 1935 he wrote a book about.... Not done
- In July 1944 he took part in the operation aimed at liberation of Wilno from the Germans "aimed at the liberation..." Not done
- After recovering from his wounds, 1945 Beynar decided to leave the resistance, and instead begun publishing in an independent Catholic weekly "began" Not done
- OK, I am guessing that your first language is not English. You need to get someone to copy-edit this article throughout. It should not have been nominated with this poor prose. You could try the WP:Guild of copyeditors, although their results can be variable - the Poland project may be able to help.
- MoS criteria appear OK
- List of works There should ideally be ISBNs for all post 1974 publications Not done
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Refs #8 and #9 (same target failed verification.[2]- Other references check out and appear to be RS, no evidence of OR
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Reasonable coverage
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- One image used, with correct license and caption.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- OK, on hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. You may wish to consider using Template:Infobox writer in the lead, but this is not a GA criterion. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:54, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Still several outstanding issues with the prose so I shall not be listing at this time. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- I fixed the refs and asked others to help with copyediting. I may be a bit busy over the next few days, and will check out your response as soon as I can. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- How is it going, do you want me to take another look? Jezhotwells (talk) 00:34, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think we are mostly done, but another day or two may help, if I dig anything else up (just today I stumbled upon a useful web reference, for example). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:20, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I will leave it for a few days. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- I thought others would've fixed the grammar issues. I addressed the remaining points, with the exception of the first one. Till his name change, I believe he should be referred to under his old (birth) name in the article. As his new name is much better known, the article should not be moved. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I will leave it for a few days. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think we are mostly done, but another day or two may help, if I dig anything else up (just today I stumbled upon a useful web reference, for example). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:20, 27 April 2011 (UTC)