Talk:Paula Wriedt

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Tasmania / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Paula Wriedt is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Protection

It is disappointing that administrators continue to make non-urgent edits to this article while it is protected from the balance of Wikipedia editors. It is unnecessary and creates an "us and them" perception. I have no problem with admins removing controversial material during a period of edit protection. The recent edits fail that criterion. WWGB (talk) 23:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend the article be unblocked. The blocking summary calls for reliable sources for the hospitalisation, however, reliable sources such as this can't be added while the article is blocked.--Lester 01:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This hasn't turned up in other news sources yet. I hope the ABC hasn't jumped the gun. Let's just leave protection in place for a few hours until another official announcement is made. I'd rather err in favour of Ms. Wriedt's privacy. Peter Ballard (talk) 02:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another article from The Examiner. -- Longhair\^talk 02:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC) This article is now behind a paywall. -- Longhair\^talk 02:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected, protection was from yesterday because the information was unverifiable. Gnan garra 02:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the claim of suicide again - I know it is probably true, and in the next few hours there will be confirmation that can be used, but the ABC report merely says that staff have been reportedly briefed, which isn't the same as an official announcement. Given that the announcement is due soon, I think it is better to hold off for a couple of hours until then. - Bilby (talk) 04:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like official confirmation will take a bit longer, after all. Although the ABC is referring to the attempted suicide claims as speculation again. - Bilby (talk) 06:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lewd remarks

The article currently says Wriedt was the subject of a comment by Sam Newman. That's ridiculous. Why do we beat around the bush and not say wat it was. Wriedt was subjected to "lewd remarks". That's how the references and the involved parties describe it. There is a big difference between lewd remarks and a comment. Considering the events that followed a week later, it's an important distinction.--Lester 01:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another option is that you are welcome to quote the actual remark here and let the reader decide. Wikipedia is not censored in this regard. Barrylb (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Paula Wriedt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paula Wriedt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060820132307/http://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/ha/ISWriedtPaula.htm to http://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/ha/ISWriedtPaula.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]