Talk:Paul Williamson
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article cannot stand alone
[edit]Perhaps it can be rescued and added to the catholic ordinariate? But it cannot stand alone unless it is expanded (quickly) to understand as to why this is Noteable.
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted because... --DeusImperator (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
I submitted this article for speedy deletion but I believe that this can have some value in the way of either English, ecclesiastical or judicial history if written correctly. Article requires expansion into these subject areas. The references seem to indicate that there might be more to this. DeusImperator (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted because... --1549bcp (talk) 17:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Frailty, thy name is Williamson, by Andrew Brown, The Independent, 15 April 1997
- Dr. Carey and the Glorious Battle
- Vicar wins royal wedding inquiry The Times, March 2, 2005
- Charity Commission asked to investigate grant to Ordinariate from Thinking Anglicans
Can you expand on this article 1549bcp?
[edit]I understand that given the new ordianariate created that crossing over the Tiber is a fairly ordinary occurring. Perhaps, the article should provide some indication as to why this person is significant. Also, did the case that he brought before the courts have a significance as in breaking new grounds etc.? A little more detail would help as you seem to know much more regarding the subject. DeusImperator (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Clarification Needed Regarding "Vexatious Litigant"
[edit]The article states that Mr. Williamson brought a legal action challenging the validity of the marriage of the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall, yet it also states that he was declared a "vexatious litigant" in 1997 and is not permitted to bring suit in the courts of the United Kingdom. If he was declared a "vexatious litigant" in 1997, and the couple did not marry until 2005, how was he able to bring a lawsuit challenging the validity of the marriage?John Paul Parks (talk) 03:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)