Talk:Paul Walsh

Paul Walsh has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 22, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Paul Walsh appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 May 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Liverpool F.C. striker Paul Walsh received months of treatment from a broken ultrasound machine?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paul Walsh.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Football: England / Liverpool Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Liverpool task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV tag

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 00:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

England Deselection

I remember Paul Walsh being dropped from England because he had to attend the funeral of his mother. Any more background on this would be good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.58.66.194 (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was because he dropped out of the under-21 squad for the Euro final.--Echetus Xe 16:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Paul Walsh/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 23:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be review this article. Here are the issues:

"Stomach injury" If possible, mention what happened that led to that.

Sorry it didn't say.--Echetus Xe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Substituted for 60 minutes". You could just write like this: "Substituted for one hour"

OK, changed that.--Echetus Xe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"He contracted a virus...". What virus?

Again didn't specify which one, so possibly they were never sure what it was exactly or it was something obscure.--Echetus Xe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's a significant reliance on his autobiography. Could you possibly vary your sources?

I have found a few more sources and added them in.--Echetus Xe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Walsh cite is a Harv error.

How do you mean?--Echetus Xe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any more images?

Not of Walsh no. I could add in the FA Cup in the honours section or Bobby Robson to the international career section or something if you think that would improve the article.--Echetus Xe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The first paragraph seems like it should be in a separate section. Also, could more info be provided about his earlier years?

I have moved it. I added a sentence another about his Londinium club. Other than that he was a typical young football who just spent his time training and relaxing at home etc.--Echetus Xe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link pundit in lead.

Done.--Echetus Xe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK thank you for the points @Tomandjerry211 (alt):, I have responded and acted upon them.--Echetus Xe 22:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
comment Just to add here, self-published sources should be used carefully. Lines currently in the article supported by his biography such as "Walsh was lucky to even make the bench", "he trained hard, ate right and acted professionally during summer 1992 to start the 1992–93 pre-season in good condition" and "He recovered to build a strong partnership with Guy Whittingham, whilst talented midfielders Alan McLoughlin and Mark Chamberlain made a highly effective four-pronged attack, and with two games to go Portsmouth were top of the table and needed only to beat struggling Sunderland to secure an automatic promotion place.", among other sentences, should be carefully re-written so as not to include so many peacock terms and avoid passing off opinion as fact. C 679 13:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

His autobiography was honest and I don't think there is any bias in the article. However I take your point that those phrases could be written more neutrally and I have now done so. Thanks.--Echetus Xe 14:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Passing, well done.Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 00:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Walsh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fa-cupfinals.co.uk/1991.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]