Talk:Paul R. Abramson (psychologist)
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
On 18 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Paul R. Abramson to Paul R. Abramson (psychologist). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 18 April 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Paul R. Abramson now redirects to Paul Abramson. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks (contribs) 01:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Paul R. Abramson → Paul R. Abramson (psychologist) – I see no primary topic against Paul R. Abramson (political scientist), who despite having a shorter article is no less prominent of a figure in the history of their field. BD2412 T 01:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. No primary topic. Redirect Paul R. Abramson to Paul Abramson. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Pageviews do not indicate a primary topic. Station1 (talk) 20:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support per Station1, 166 v 115 views isn't probably enough for a PT. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.