This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was Delete, but eventually relisted due tainted votes..
This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was No consensus.
This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was Cancelled due to sockpuppetry.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
I'm pretty sure that speedy recreated content doesn't apply here. The article was nominated for deletion, socks overran the discussion, the article was restored at DRV, the article was relisted at AFD with no consensus. So even assuming that there was a CSD criteria that applied (nn-bio doesn't, as the article clearly states a reason why the person is notable), it needs to go back to afd if you want it deleted.
However, since the person who placed the speedy tag is a longtime contributor I wanted another admin to see if they agree with me instead of just me removing the speedy tag. Syrthiss23:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can we please send this to AFD again and do something to insure that there is none of the crap that happened with the past AFDs which were filled with possible sockpuppets. My vote would be to merge the article into the WTVT news team article, but this article is symptomatic of a larger problem no established policy on local TV personalties and if they meet the notablity guidelines. TV Newser23:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ... I'm the tagger. I was completely unaware of the DRV; I just saw a recreated article and slapped the speedy tag on it. Everything is obviously in order, so I'm going to withdraw the request. My apologies for stirring up more trouble for all of you, and for being unacceptably sloppy in my quick review of the deletion history in the first place. --Aaron23:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
