This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
The article quotes Mukungubila's message as saying "Gideon Mukungubila has come to free you from the slavery of the Rwandan". The link on "Rwandan" is to Rwanda, however, it is actually a derogarory, perhaps incendiary slur on President Kabila, whose father was installed by Rwandan leaders in 1996-97 (see December 2013 Kinshasa attacks). So, Wikilinking to Rwanda is not explanatory, and even perpetuates the derogatory / incendiary slur. However, it also seems incorrect to simply link "The Rwandan" to the article on Kabila, as it would have the same effect. Anyone have suggestions on how to resolve this while maintaining NPOV? Tzf (talk) 00:09, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since there is no discussion about the neutrality of the article in spite of the presence of the POV tag - I agree with whoever put it that the article appears to be biased, namely in favour of Mukungubila. Does he deny that the attackers were his followers and do most sources accept or reject that identification? (Other wikipedia articles unambiguously state that they were his followers.) And are the organisations that gave him awards really independent and notable? In general, the article reads as if it had been written by a PR team of Mukungubila's.--62.73.69.121 (talk) 05:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
