Talk:Patron Capital
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved, uncontroversial. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 01:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Patron capital → Patron Capital – the name was badly created (before Patron capital) as all words should have capital letter at the beginningFifou1111 (talk) 20:52, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy support – There's no reason to think that the move could be controversial, so just do it instead of using an RM. Dicklyon (talk) 23:11, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Advertising and puffery
[edit]This article has issues with it's style and the adjectives used. The tag I placed previously was removed without discussion or comment. Please discuss these issues here before removing the tag again. TreacherousWays (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I have updated this article, amending the style, updating the information and adding the references. I would suggest that the tag can now be removed, unless there are further issues? Hgeorge22 (talk) 21:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)