Talk:Patrologia Orientalis
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikify
[edit]If anyone can tell me what needs doing to the list of volumes and contents, I'd be happy to do it. The tag doesn't tell me much. Roger Pearse 09:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- The tag was posted by Dbachmann, so you can ask him for more specifics. My thoughts are that the Manual of Style might give some help, but at the very least there should be consistency within the section. There is an obvious format change after volume 41. The vast majority of the section is not in English, which is another significant problem, because this is the English language wikipedia. GRBerry 13:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. Oh well, probably best to just delete it. I don't know that translating the titles of the volumes into English would be a good idea, tho.Roger Pearse 17:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roger Pearse (talk • contribs)
- However imperfect the list is worth keeping.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 18:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. Oh well, probably best to just delete it. I don't know that translating the titles of the volumes into English would be a good idea, tho.Roger Pearse 17:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roger Pearse (talk • contribs)