Talk:Patrol Point

India Low‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Standalone or Merge

Should this topic be completely merged into Line of Actual Control?
OR
Should this article stay, and a summary of Patrol Point be added to Line of Actual Control?
DTM (talk) 07:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Talk:Line of Actual Control

DTM (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak merge: A merge to Line of Actual Control would be reasonable since that article is not very developed and the Patrol Points/Patrolling Points are discussed solely in that context (i.e. context and length in WP:MERGEREASON). The topics probably aren't quite discrete enough for separate articles. Could go either way though, particularly if the two articles are significantly developed further.
As a side note independent of whether this gets merged, the article should probably decide whether these are most commonly called "Patrol Points" or "Patrolling Points" (the first sentence and title do not currently match). — MarkH₂₁^talk 21:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: This is not a stand alone concept but makes sense only in the context of LAC. So obviously it should be merged. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]