Jump to content

Talk:PA System (artist group)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Below is the confirmation from Patrick Thompson that I may use his text/ photos from the url's listed.

Have I "done good"?


- COPYRIGHT: I emailed Patrick Thompson asking if I can use some text and photos for which he is the copyright holder (including the relevant links in the email) in the wikipedia article. He said that I could and I emailed his answer to permissions-en@wikipedia.org and permissions-commons@wikipedia.org (please find the content of the email below).
- ISSUE: Does the email cover what I need? If not please explain what I can do. I'm not sure if I have the correct license information in the email to/from Patrick.
- NOTABILITY: Patrick is an artist of note and reputation in his field (street art/ graffiti) certain in North America and to an extent internationally.
Thank you in advance!


Hello,
I am creating a wikipedia page for Patrick Thompson - Evoke. I tried to yesterday but it was deleted (it was my first entry and I neglected to get consent from Patrick Thompson). I hope the consent below is sufficent, if it is not please tell me - as simply as possible :) - what I need from Patrick. Regards!


Forwarded Message ----

From: Pt <evocal@gmail.com> To: ymailvan <ymailvan@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2009 2:11:49 AM Subject: Re: seeking permission for wikipedia page 1) please do use the information (images and text) from the links you mentioned above.

2) I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of WORKS:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gobmagazine/3454116699/
http://patrickevoke.blogspot.com
www.flickr.com/photos/patrickevoke
http://patthompson.them.ca
I agree to publish that work (both the text and images in the links above) under the free license LICENSE for text: GFDL, v. 1.2 or later and CC-BY-SA version 3.0].
I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
May 7th, 2009, Patrick Thompson
yours patrick Thompson

647 878 5239



On 7-May-09, at 1:23, ymailvan <ymailvan@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Patrick Thompson,
I am writing to confirm whether permission is granted to use text and photos from:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gobmagazine/3454116699/
http://patrickevoke.blogspot.com
www.flickr.com/photos/patrickevoke
http://patthompson.them.ca

from your website under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFDL ). A user with the *[IP xxx/ username xxx] has pasted in text from your website [WEBSITE ADDRESS] to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The text concerns [TOPIC OF PAGE] and the original submission can be viewed at [Address of Pre-copyvio boilerplate version].
This user claims on the talk page [TALK PAGE ADDRESS] to *[have the authority to release this material under the GFDL/ be the original author of the material], but for the page to remain on our site, we need further evidence that this is the case. Please be assured that if you do not grant permission, your content will not be used at Wikipedia; we have a strict policy against copyright violations.
You can read the GNU Free Document License in full athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GFDL. (To keep things simple, we do not use Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts, or Back-Cover Texts.) The license stipulates that any copy of the material, even if modified, must carry the same license. This means that anyone would be licensed to distribute the material, possibly for a fee (we would distribute your work free of charge). Under the license, no distributor (commercial or otherwise) can restrict future distribution, so your work would never become proprietary. In addition, the license does not grant the right to imply your endorsement of a modified version. Please note that your contributions may not remain intact as submitted; this license and the collaborative nature of our project entitles others to edit, alter, and update content at will, i.e., to keep up with new information, or suit the text to a different purpose. There is more information on our copyright policy at:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights . The article will be deleted in seven days time if permission is not confirmed, though it can be restored at a later date if you choose to respond later to state that such use is allowed.
Thank you for your time. I look forward to your response.
Yours faithfully,
John
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisgoot (talkcontribs) 06:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

[edit]

Why does this person even have a wiki page? As far as a google search can tell - it's just some guy show makes art in cool places. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.33.61.7 (talkcontribs) 00:54, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contest edited and sources cited

[edit]

Hello,

For some reason the template messages still appear at the top of the wikipedia page I have edited even when a decent amount of external links and sources were cited. Will this usually go away after a number of days or is there something else I should be doing to correct it?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by PatrickBKThompson (talkcontribs) 12:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PatrickBKThompson: External links have to be removed before we can remove that maintenance tag. I just moved two out of the intro to the bottom of the article; I need to see what other cleanup is needed. The other tags will stay until independent editors have reviewed the article and are sure the issues have been addressed. —C.Fred (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patrick Thompson (artist) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Thompson (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Thompson (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — PaleoNeonate — 20:33, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move and rename as a page about the collaboration

[edit]

I'm going to move and rename as a page about the collaboration because he is not notable, though the collaboration is. #Gendergap. This was what the AfD ended up recommending anyway.--Theredproject (talk) 02:45, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]