Talk:Patrick Francis Healy/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 10:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:

A very engaging lede, absorbing reading.
This article exposes the terrible history of slavery and racism in the Deep South. Well handled.
Nonetheless the question of race - for Healy and his brothers is handled with sensitivity despite snide whisperings...
Just a question about 'clinic' education which was introduced for the School of Medicine. Is it 'clinic' or 'clinical'?
- It should be clinical. I've fixed it. Y
Good selection of images.

Passed --Whiteguru (talk) 04:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Whiteguru. Ergo Sum 05:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.